Hi I am brand new to your site and am asking for help I have tongue cancer without prefacing your response what can you tell me to cure or kill this cancer and I will further reply with comments and questions
the cancer is on top of the tongue at the back and it is the raised type of cancer (nodule)
I look forward to hearing from you all for REAL alternative cures
One very real alt treatment is Su-jok - advanced acupuncture
with much more efficient energy paths at use.
There's been a more than few reports of succesful treatment even at last stages of disease, I can point the Russian source which has English reprints for most of the articles.
The healing schemes are usually rather simple, especially if cancer is well localised, and more efficient than in classic acupuincture, but! - the treatment is to be done by really qualified and attentive practitioner, as there's chance to speed up cancer proliferation instead of terminating.
I don't know of something specific for tongue, but the only real cure for cancer that I know is mind body detox. This involves natural things like Water Fasting, Colon Cleansing, Juicing and Breathing.
Get hold of a book called "The Tao of Detox" by Daniel Reid, it explains how "cancer is the final, final stage of tissue toxicity".
In connection with this, bare in mind that most cancer patients (95%) of die from chemotherapy.
In connection with this, bare in mind that most cancer patients (95%) of die from chemotherapy.
Crikey - where did you find that information???
In connection with this, bare in mind that most cancer patients (95%) of die from chemotherapy.
Goodness, how bizarre. Based on these stats, I must happen to personally know the 5% who go into long term remission after chemo.
Crikey - where did you find that information???
Well I didn't make it up! Why not google it?
These are a few quotes from oncologists and researchers:
Dr Ralph Moss, Author of Questioning Chemotherapy
Two to 4% of cancers respond to chemotherapy. The bottom line is for a few kinds of cancer chemo is a life extending procedure - Hodgkin's disease, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Testicular cancer, and Choriocarcinoma.
Dr Ulrich Abel
Success of most chemotherapy is appalling. There is no scientific evidence for its ability to extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancer chemotherapy for malignancies too advanced for surgery which accounts for 80% of all cancers is a scientific wasteland.
Dr John Diamond:
Chemotherapy's success record is dismal. It can achieve remissions in about 7% of all human cancers; for an additional 15% of cases, survival can be "prolonged" beyond the point at which death would be expected without treatment. This type of survival is not the same as a cure or even restored quality of life.
Keep in mind that the 5 year mark is still used as the official guideline for "cure" by mainstream oncologists. Statistically, the 5 year cure makes chemotherapy look good for certain kinds of cancer, but when you follow cancer patients beyond 5 years, the reality often shifts in a dramatic way.
Dr J. Bailer, New England Journal of Medicine. Dr Bailer’s answer to questions put by Neal Barnard MD of the Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine:
The five year cancer survival statistics of the American Cancer Society are very misleading. They now count things that are not cancer, and, because we are able to diagnose at an earlier stage of the disease, patients falsely appear to live longer. Our whole cancer research in the past 20 years has been a failure. More people over 30 are dying from cancer than ever before.
More women with mild or benign diseases are being included in statistics and reported as being "cured". When government officials point to survival figures and say they are winning the war against cancer they are using those survival rates improperly.
Dr Julian Whitaker:
I look upon cancer in the same way that I look upon heart disease, arthritis, high blood pressure, or even obesity, for that matter, in that by dramatically strengthening the body's immune system through diet, nutritional supplements, and exercise, the body can rid itself of the cancer, just as it does in other degenerative diseases.
Consequently, I wouldn't have chemotherapy and radiation because I'm not interested in therapies that cripple the immune system, and, in my opinion, virtually ensure failure for the majority of cancer patients.
John Robbins:
Percentage of cancer patients whose lives are predictably saved by chemotherapy: 3%
Conclusive evidence (majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influcence on survival or quality of life: none.
Percentage of oncologists who said if they had cancer they would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its "ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity: 75%
Dr Alan Levin:
Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumours. Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it.
Dr Glen Warner
We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison.
Even googling it, I cannot find a statement that actually comes out and declares "most cancer patients (95%) of die from chemotherapy". Statisticians can bend numbers to 'prove' almost anything. I will simply have to count myself lucky to be amongst the 5% who 'survived' - along with the clients that I see on a daily basis.
Even googling it, I cannot find a statement that actually comes out and declares "most cancer patients (95%) of die from chemotherapy". Statisticians can bend numbers to 'prove' almost anything. I will simply have to count myself lucky to be amongst the 5% who 'survived' - along with the clients that I see on a daily basis.
Glad to know that you "survived", and I'm sure your making the lifestyle chages needed to ensure that you will survive. Statitically, though, your case does not necessarily put you in the 5% - this would be the case if you had no further cancer for the rest of your life. I don't know how old you are, but say we take a 20 year old, he'd need to be without cancer for 50 years to say that he had been "cured" of cancer by the chemotherapy drugs.
Yes, statisticians can bend numbers - though this works both ways, the drug companies will try to show how effective their new drugs are, while the naturopaths and the like will try to show that poisoning an ill person with ever more powerful toxic chemicals is never going to "cure" him.
I suppose its a matter of what you choose to believe.
I've had several close relatives die following chemotherapy, "cure", remission... I also have a frind who is doing well after chemo and he also natural/complementary therapies like diet. Personally, I wouldn't trust what the drug companies say because they are in the business of making money and if they were to admit that natural remedies can work and toxic drugs don't, they'd put themselves out of business.
If I had cancer I would't go for chemo, and in a survey 75% of Oncologists said that they would't go for chemo either if they had cancer.
Having worked in chemistry and biochemistry I can say chemotherapy
is plain barbaric regarding the effects on the whole body,
compared to Yin-Yang balancing of various ways, and very often
lead to cancer regrouping + developing resistance
to.
Though in case of superfast tumour developing this might be the only
chance to harness thing to some extent.
If I had cancer I would't go for chemo, and in a survey 75% of Oncologists said that they would't go for chemo either if they had cancer.
I wouldn't have chemo either.
It makes no sense to me to fight cancer with pure poison!